As I've arrived in each city along my travels, I've checked the Things to See and Do on the internet, often using TripAdvisor or similar sites. Over the last few days I've been contemplating what makes a tourist site.
I'm here at Céskŷ Krumlov, one of THE places to visit in the Czech Republic and yet another UNESCO World Heritage site. (I must work out how many I've been to on the trip). It attracts a huge number of day trips from Prague, Vienna or Germany. All of the central part of the town is devoted to tourism, with places to visit, stay, eat, and buy jewellery or other trinkets. And yet, apart from the Castle (which unfortunately had its main section closed between Christmas and New Year) and the museum, there is little I can see to attract me.
Perhaps I am jaded, having seen too many amazing places, too many cathedrals, too many world class museums and beautiful buildings. Actually, I really enjoyed the museum, because it gave me the history of the town from the Bronze Age through to the end of Communism.
So I'm wondering what all these day trippers are doing. Maybe taking photos of each other in front of churches, quaint buildings and castle towers is all they expect or desire.
I had a similar experience in Prague where the #1 tourist site, the Castle complex, was the one that left me most disappointed. It was expensive, the audio guide was even more expensive, and they asked for a $25 surety (500 Ckrowns), and compared to Windsor Castle there was little to see. The American guy I had dinner with went to the Castle between our two dinners and agreed with my assessment. He didn't even like the 'Golden Alley' which I had enjoyed.
So what makes a good tourist site?
As I look back, the places that have stayed most in mind are either scenically special or inspired me to take time to learn about the people, place and history. So the History of Communism museum in Prague, although very amateurish by museum standards, was fascinating because it took me into the life of the people.
It will be interesting to see what Vienna brings.
I'm here at Céskŷ Krumlov, one of THE places to visit in the Czech Republic and yet another UNESCO World Heritage site. (I must work out how many I've been to on the trip). It attracts a huge number of day trips from Prague, Vienna or Germany. All of the central part of the town is devoted to tourism, with places to visit, stay, eat, and buy jewellery or other trinkets. And yet, apart from the Castle (which unfortunately had its main section closed between Christmas and New Year) and the museum, there is little I can see to attract me.
Perhaps I am jaded, having seen too many amazing places, too many cathedrals, too many world class museums and beautiful buildings. Actually, I really enjoyed the museum, because it gave me the history of the town from the Bronze Age through to the end of Communism.
So I'm wondering what all these day trippers are doing. Maybe taking photos of each other in front of churches, quaint buildings and castle towers is all they expect or desire.
I had a similar experience in Prague where the #1 tourist site, the Castle complex, was the one that left me most disappointed. It was expensive, the audio guide was even more expensive, and they asked for a $25 surety (500 Ckrowns), and compared to Windsor Castle there was little to see. The American guy I had dinner with went to the Castle between our two dinners and agreed with my assessment. He didn't even like the 'Golden Alley' which I had enjoyed.
So what makes a good tourist site?
As I look back, the places that have stayed most in mind are either scenically special or inspired me to take time to learn about the people, place and history. So the History of Communism museum in Prague, although very amateurish by museum standards, was fascinating because it took me into the life of the people.
It will be interesting to see what Vienna brings.